Crypto

Your liquidation is someone else's limit order — how cascades actually work Your liquidation is someone else's limit order — how cascades actually work

ddddd · views 3 ·
Most people think of liquidation as the exchange closing a losing position. That is true but incomplete, and the incomplete version leads to bad decisions. When your leveraged position hits the liquidation price, the exchange does not simply mark it closed. It sends a market order to close it. If you were long, that is a market sell hitting the book. That order consumes bids, which pushes price lower, which brings the next position closer to its own liquidation price. This is the mechanism behind cascades. One liquidation creates the price movement that triggers the next. In a thin book, a few large positions can chain into a move far larger than any news would justify. Two things follow that are not obvious. The first is that liquidation clusters are visible in advance. Positions taken at similar prices with similar leverage liquidate at similar levels. Aggregators publish heatmaps of where these clusters sit. This is public information, which means it is also a target. Price has a tendency to reach toward dense clusters, because reaching them releases forced flow, and forced flow is the most reliable liquidity in the market. If you can see where the stops are, so can everyone else. Placing your own liquidation price inside an obvious cluster is choosing to be the fuel. The second is that wicks are usually liquidations, not sentiment. A candle that spikes several percent down and recovers within minutes rarely reflects anyone changing their view on the asset. It reflects forced sellers meeting a thin book, then the book refilling. Reading that wick as a signal about fundamentals is reading noise. A practical consequence: the same leverage is not the same risk at different times. Weekend and holiday books are thinner. Identical position size and identical leverage produce a much larger price impact when there is less depth to absorb it, which is why cascades cluster in low-liquidity hours. If you use leverage, the useful question is not how much can I borrow. It is where does my liquidation sit relative to everyone else's, and how thin is the book at that level. Those two questions determine whether you are the one being liquidated into other people's orders, or the one whose limit orders get filled by them.Most people think of liquidation as the exchange closing a losing position. That is true but incomplete, and the incomplete version leads to bad decisions. When your leveraged position hits the liquidation price, the exchange does not simply mark it closed. It sends a market order to close it. If you were long, that is a market sell hitting the book. That order consumes bids, which pushes price lower, which brings the next position closer to its own liquidation price. This is the mechanism behind cascades. One liquidation creates the price movement that triggers the next. In a thin book, a few large positions can chain into a move far larger than any news would justify. Two things follow that are not obvious. The first is that liquidation clusters are visible in advance. Positions taken at similar prices with similar leverage liquidate at similar levels. Aggregators publish heatmaps of where these clusters sit. This is public information, which means it is also a target. Price has a tendency to reach toward dense clusters, because reaching them releases forced flow, and forced flow is the most reliable liquidity in the market. If you can see where the stops are, so can everyone else. Placing your own liquidation price inside an obvious cluster is choosing to be the fuel. The second is that wicks are usually liquidations, not sentiment. A candle that spikes several percent down and recovers within minutes rarely reflects anyone changing their view on the asset. It reflects forced sellers meeting a thin book, then the book refilling. Reading that wick as a signal about fundamentals is reading noise. A practical consequence: the same leverage is not the same risk at different times. Weekend and holiday books are thinner. Identical position size and identical leverage produce a much larger price impact when there is less depth to absorb it, which is why cascades cluster in low-liquidity hours. If you use leverage, the useful question is not how much can I borrow. It is where does my liquidation sit relative to everyone else's, and how thin is the book at that level. Those two questions determine whether you are the one being liquidated into other people's orders, or the one whose limit orders get filled by them.
A liquidation is a market order, not a bookkeeping entry Closing one position moves price into the next one price hits liquidation level forced market sell eats the bids price drops further next position liquidates the loop repeats — this is the cascade Clusters are public Similar entries at similar leverage liquidate at similar prices. dense price tends to reach toward these Sharp wicks that recover in minutes are usually forced flow meeting a thin book — not anyone changing their mind. Same leverage is not same risk. Weekend books are thinner, so identical size moves price further.
0

Comments 0

?